General Discussion >> Hurricane Ask/Tell

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
digitlnoize
Registered User


Reged: Thu
Posts: 1
Bill Gates Wants to Control Hurricanes
      #85749 - Thu Jul 16 2009 05:43 PM

http://www.usatoday.com/weather/research/2009-07-15-gates-hurricanes_N.htm

What do you guys think? Total BS?

(Thread moved tp the proper Forum.)

Edited by Ed Dunham (Sun Jul 19 2009 03:55 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MichaelA
Weather Analyst


Reged: Thu
Posts: 945
Loc: Pinellas Park, FL
Re: Bill Gates Wants to Control Hurricanes [Re: digitlnoize]
      #85752 - Fri Jul 17 2009 09:17 AM

Over the years, there have been several attempts at decreasing storm intensities. I don't believe we should alter them since they are essential for global climate balance. The best tropical storm defense is good preparedness.

--------------------
Michael

PWS


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bobbutts
Weather Hobbyist


Reged: Mon
Posts: 71
Loc: New Hampshire
Re: Bill Gates Wants to Control Hurricanes [Re: digitlnoize]
      #85754 - Fri Jul 17 2009 03:05 PM

This would have to be done ahead of the hurricane, and then all the equipment moved out of the area before the storm hits. To me this would seem to be the biggest drawback since it requires an accurate forecast and lead time with dangerous and or expensive consequences. That means it's subject to forecast error, e.g. they could pump out near New Orleans and watch the storm pass by to Texas.

Beyond that, if I remember correctly, Katrina intensified over the loop current and deteriorated near the coast. It's common with N. Gulf coast storms due to some combination of landmass dryness, latitude, and other local factors. Regardless, the Storm Surge, the part of the hurricane that devastated New Orleans and much of the Gulf coast did not seem to respond significantly to the wind and structure reduction just before landfall. I don't see any expectation that this plan would reduce surge, and I don't see any reason to believe the damage from Katrina would have been significantly less with reduced wind..

Charley would have been a better example as it's intensification was very close to land and made landfall and had heavy wind damage but little surge damage. Knocking 5-10 mph off of the top winds there would probably have saved some money.

Regardless, this seems like a futile waste of time to me, the money would be better spent helping victims and designing better future storm defenses (wetland protection, stronger structures, better evactuation plans, etc)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MichaelA
Weather Analyst


Reged: Thu
Posts: 945
Loc: Pinellas Park, FL
Re: Bill Gates Wants to Control Hurricanes [Re: bobbutts]
      #85755 - Fri Jul 17 2009 03:30 PM

Actually, it was the failure of the levees along the shore of Lake Pontchartrain that flooded the South Ward rather than a storm surge from the Gulf (the eye of Katrina passed to the East of the city). The small surge associated with Charley was probably due to its rapid intensification near the coast and the very small size of the storm.

--------------------
Michael

PWS


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CFHC, Ed Dunham, Colleen A., danielw, Clark, RedingtonBeachGuy, Bloodstar, tpratch, typhoon_tip, cieldumort 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 6192

Rate this topic

Jump to

Mobile Home - Login - Normal Flhurricane Site
This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources.
Generated May 4, 2024, 12:43:46 PM EDT
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center